Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added ability to set table type as configuration options and as table properties on table in Iceberg #5656

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

sshkvar
Copy link
Contributor

@sshkvar sshkvar commented Oct 22, 2020

In current implementation table type is hard coded. Because of it there is issue with deleting table data from s3.

These changes adding ability to set up default Iceberg table type as configuration option. Also table type can be set on table creation step

Possible solution for #5616

@cla-bot
Copy link

cla-bot bot commented Oct 22, 2020

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have you on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please submit the signed CLA to cla@prestosql.io. For more information, see https://github.com/prestosql/cla.

@findepi findepi changed the title Added ability to set table type as configuration options and as table properties on table. Added ability to set table type as configuration options and as table properties on table in Iceberg Oct 22, 2020
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Nov 24, 2020
@sshkvar sshkvar requested a review from electrum November 24, 2020 15:07
@sshkvar
Copy link
Contributor Author

sshkvar commented Nov 24, 2020

@rdblue @electrum I will be really appreciate for your review of this PR.
We really want to use Iceberg in our company, but this issue is stopping us. We need to have ability to delete data files from s3 (to prevent a lot of orphan tables, which removed from hive metastore but not from s3)

@mosabua
Copy link
Member

mosabua commented Oct 20, 2022

👋 @sshkvar - this PR has become inactive. If you're still interested in working on it, please let us know, and we can try to get reviewers to help with that.

We're working on closing out old and inactive PRs, so if you're too busy or this has too many merge conflicts to be worth picking back up, we'll be making another pass to close it out in a few weeks.

cc @findepi @electrum

@colebow colebow closed this Nov 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants